746. Min Cost Climbing Stairs
At a Glance
- Topic: dp-1d
- Pattern: Dynamic Programming (linear minimum cost)
- Difficulty: Easy
- Companies: Amazon, Google, Adobe, Uber, Bloomberg
- Frequency: High
- LeetCode: 746
Problem (one-liner)
Each stair index has a non-negative cost[index]. Pay that cost to step onto it; start at index 0 or 1. Reach past the last index with minimum total cost. Input: cost array. Output: minimum sum.
Recognition Cues
- “Minimum cost” + “from step
iyou can go toi+1ori+2” - Start position choice (first or second stair)
- Top is beyond last index (pay once then exit)
Diagram
At-a-glance flow (replace with problem-specific Mermaid as you refine this note). camelCase node IDs; no spaces in IDs.
Loading diagram…
Approaches
- Brute force — enumerate all paths — exponential time.
- Better — top-down memo from each index —
O(n)time /O(n)space. - Optimal — bottom-up min of two predecessors —
O(n)time /O(1)space. <- pick this in interview.
Optimal Solution
Go
package main
func minCostClimbingStairsTable(cost []int) int {
length := len(cost)
dp := make([]int, length+1)
dp[0], dp[1] = 0, 0
for index := 2; index <= length; index++ {
payCurrent := dp[index-1] + cost[index-1]
payPrevious := dp[index-2] + cost[index-2]
if payCurrent < payPrevious {
dp[index] = payCurrent
} else {
dp[index] = payPrevious
}
}
return dp[length]
}
func minCostClimbingStairs(cost []int) int {
length := len(cost)
prevPrev := 0
prev := 0
for index := 2; index <= length; index++ {
payCurrent := prev + cost[index-1]
payPrevious := prevPrev + cost[index-2]
next := payCurrent
if payPrevious < payCurrent {
next = payPrevious
}
prevPrev = prev
prev = next
}
return prev
}JavaScript
function minCostClimbingStairsTable(cost) {
const length = cost.length;
const dp = new Array(length + 1).fill(0);
for (let index = 2; index <= length; index++) {
dp[index] = Math.min(
dp[index - 1] + cost[index - 1],
dp[index - 2] + cost[index - 2]
);
}
return dp[length];
}
function minCostClimbingStairs(cost) {
const length = cost.length;
let prevPrev = 0;
let prev = 0;
for (let index = 2; index <= length; index++) {
const next = Math.min(
prev + cost[index - 1],
prevPrev + cost[index - 2]
);
prevPrev = prev;
prev = next;
}
return prev;
}Walkthrough
Input: cost = [10, 15, 20]
| index (landing) | from index-1 | from index-2 | dp[index] |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 1 | — | — | 0 |
| 2 | 0+10=10 | 0+0 invalid — use 0 from start | 10 |
| 3 | 10+15=25 | 0+10=10 | 10 |
Reach past index 2 with cost 10.
Invariant: dp[index] is min cost to stand on step index (or 0 for virtual start); transition always adds cost of the stair you step onto.
Edge Cases
- Length
2: answer ismin(cost[0], cost[1]) - All zeros → answer
0 - Large costs still fit in int for typical constraints
Pitfalls
- Adding cost of stair you leave instead of stair you land on
- Confusing “top” as last index instead of one past last
- Allocating
dpof lengthnonly — needn+1for destination past last stair
Similar Problems
- 70. Climbing Stairs — counting paths without costs.
- 198. House Robber — adjacent constraint with max sum.
Variants
- Variable jump lengths → longer rolling window or full table.
- Must land exactly on last stair (no “past top”) → shift indices in recurrence.
Mind-Map Tags
#dp-1d #linear-dp #min-cost-path #rolling-state #easy
Last updated on
Spotted something unclear or wrong on this page?